Chapter 244 The Stubborn Illness of Thinking

The demons are humans of the past?

And the humans in Paradise are artificial humans?

Then

What is Paradise?

A petri dish, a culture tank?

Following the perspective of creation and association, Yao Yan built a bridge between "Paradise" and "culture tank".

If we start thinking again and think about the elements of the worldview source corresponding to this world from the perspective of creation and association, then there is only one last step left.

Find "Paradise".

If Paradise is not an entity and has no relics and history, then it may be the real world, a certain history of the "main world".

According to his previous theory, a trial space, this world itself can be divided into two parts.

One part can be described as "setting", corresponding to the worldview of the spiritual source, or "origin", these origins are unreasonable.

If the spiritual source believes that the world is round, then the world is round, and the spiritual source believes that the world is square, then the world will be square.

This is the "framework".

The other part is "continuation", which corresponds to the "setting" of the worldview of the spiritual sources, as the beginning, and then continues to develop. These developed things, unlike the "framework", have no absolute coercive force.

Take the previous Sunstone world as an example.

The development of language itself is not achieved overnight, and various social influences will leave traces on the language.

And through the traces themselves, problems can be discovered.

If you have not experienced the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, you will not like to use "there is a good person" when speaking.

From a linguistic point of view, isolating languages, agglutinative languages, and inflectional languages ​​will develop towards another direction over time. However, even if they are isolating languages, the word order and usage habits of the language, the origin of words and allusions, etc. are all different.

If isolating languages ​​have one, two, and three, agglutinative languages ​​have ABC, and inflectional languages ​​have 123, then the agglutinative isolating language can be one A, one B, or one C, and the inflectional agglutinative language can be A1, A2, and A3.

These changes are like gene sequences, and their changes themselves will be recorded in the language.

A1, B3

This is just a simplified description without most variables.

Isolated languages ​​will naturally become agglutinative, but the time is long or short, and the degree of agglutinativeness of which words and sentences are different.

At this time, if another civilization breaks in through economic exchanges or conquests, then the local language will be affected.

Some isolated languages ​​are inflected by foreign language habits after they have completed agglutination.

Some isolated languages ​​are inflected by foreign language habits just at the beginning or halfway through.

Or vice versa, a language is inflected and then returned to agglutinative.

The language he is used to, such as isolated languages, has a great influence on semantics in the order of words and characters.

I love you and you love me, and you and I love each other.

It is necessary to follow a strict structure.

But in Japanese, I love you and you love me all mean the same thing.

These language habits themselves, the grammar, word meanings, and pronunciation lengths in these languages ​​are all historical records.

The usage of language will also affect people's habits.

If the word expressing judgment is placed at the end of the sentence, such as "I want to kill you, no", then people will be accustomed to listening to the sentence before speaking in life.

This language habit will make people more patient, or more insidious, and the habit of joking will also change.

As the other party of the dialogue, the third party will also have different situations.

However, as far as Yao Yan knows, these knowledge are relatively backward theories.

Although it is not outdated, the lack of other theories as supplements can cause a great impact.

A person's thinking habits, a person's memory, and a person's worldview are also affected by language habits.

The various things and experiences a person has are not isolated.

People are used to simplifying, and are used to omitting things that they think are "unnecessary" and "can be omitted".

But what is more terrible is that they often don't know what the standard of simplification is when they make the simplification behavior.

This itself is also the "optimal structure" formed by the human body to reduce unnecessary energy consumption.

If you have to go through all the nouns in detail every time you think, although you can ensure a relatively high accuracy, it is time-consuming and laborious.

Survival of the fittest, is it that the best survive and the others are eliminated, or that a certain period of excellence survives and the others are eliminated, or that only the worst are eliminated and the better ones survive?

The fact is that an injured person dropped money when passing by, and when people saw the scene and traced back, they thought that someone was robbed and injured.

Yao Yan was very cautious.

He knew that if there were any mistakes in the details of the judgment and tracing of the "paradise", then his understanding of real history would gradually deviate with the step-by-step process.

He needed to find a clear enough clue.

If the dividing line that can determine whether it is "frame history" or "continuation of history" is found, that would be the best result.

But he would not hold any expectations.

Are the current demons humans, and the current humans artificial humans?

A question arises.

What is the standard for judging "humanity"?

Is it the origin judgment, or the current stage as the judgment standard?

Let’s take an example, “emperor”.

The earliest emperor is the emperor, and the others who came later are not emperors?

If the emperors who came later are also emperors, then an invisible presupposition and standard will appear -

“Is the emperor unique?”

“Is human beings unique?”

This question is very important.

People are used to simplifying, thinking, logic, and standards.

Black and white, light and dark, high and low.

“Except black, everything is white” is not clear enough.

“Except bright, everything is dark” may be a clearer explanation.

This is a common thinking inertia of “simplification” rooted in human thinking.

Then, according to the theory of the formation of the world, whether “human beings” are unique may be the core point that triggers the worldview conflict in this world.

If it is based on the unique origin, this world where genes determine everything

the demon is the “orthodox”.

To subvert thinking, subvert habits, and subvert a person’s worldview, you must start by subverting his “supposed” concept.

If so, then his choice can be -

to completely eliminate the demon.

Going a step further, other species can be turned into humans, demons, and completely replace the position of "humans".

But if not, but just "having human appearance or..."

"Looking similar, it is considered human"

Then, Yao Yan should choose to make the humanoid creatures in this world lose their human form.

All the crows raised their heads at the same time at this moment.