2000: Generals only for This Moment! (2 More)

"Mr. Mond, you are a well-known architect who is worthy of newcomers to learn. You have achieved outstanding achievements in the field of architecture. You are the role model I aspire to. It is difficult for a student like me to have anything with a well-known architect like you. Intersection, if it is not fortunate that you and your daughter have been classmates for a year, this kind of intersection is almost impossible. I am standing a few meters away from you now. In fact, where I am, I have worked hard with you for many years. Compared with the status, it is the distance between China and the United States, and the difference between the Chinese architectural circle and the world's mainstream architectural circles. I am nothing in the Chinese architectural circle, so how can I compare to you, the Pritzker Architecture Prize The winner?"

Xia Xiaolan looked directly at Mond Dawson.

Mond has two portfolios in front of him, which he has not yet started to read.

But Eric sent those to the jury, and the jury members were already looking at them.

The jury's aesthetic appreciation of architectural works will not be higher than that of a group of people outside the court. Everyone is not a professional, and can only be appreciated from the perspective of ordinary people.

wow wow wow-

This is the sound of flipping copperplate colored paper.

"Of course I can't compare to you, but I will work hard in this direction. I'm only 22 years old. It's normal that I can't compare to you now. When I'm 32 or 42 years old, I may be eligible to talk to you on an equal footing. The premise is that I have the opportunity to not be excluded from the international architecture circle because of other people's slander!"

"The most ironic thing about this infringement case is not the defendant's smearing of me, but in the United States, a country that advocates equal rights, someone will convict me first with a fixed impression!"

"The appearance is given by my parents, and it just fits the aesthetics of some people. It doesn't mean that I shouldn't work hard."

"I'm Chinese, it doesn't mean that my IQ should be lower than others. How many Americans have the 'American Dream' inspired? Everyone has the opportunity to create miracles. Why is the excellence of a Chinese person being questioned?"

"Using her private life to attack a woman is the most shameless and indecent method. What's the point of forcing witnesses to admit in court that they like me? Like it does not mean desire, and liking does not mean that he should lose the most basic moral standards. Perjury for my sake!"

"These words, I said at the door of the court in the morning, I hope that those who are at the door of the court and who are enthusiastic about this lawsuit can be a good 'judge', and whoever has better works, who is more likely to renovate the theatre I hope all jury members can participate in the judgment together. Your approval may not determine the outcome of the lawsuit, but I believe you will have your own judgment! "

"As for Mr. Mond Dawson, judge from your professional perspective, who is more powerful between Lisa and I? If Lisa is not as good as me, why would I want to invade a woman with low strength and not as good as me? Architect's work?"

"It is said that Mr. Mond expressed doubts to the aia supernova architects jury. You once had a conversation with the defendant, Ms. Lisa, at the construction site of the theater. After a conversation, you can determine that Lisa is the creator of the scheme - you You can swear on your honor that you can be judged fairly? Did you see the defendant create this plan with your own eyes?"

buzzing.

The jury debated loudly.

Finally, a jury spoke:

"I [guchengdushu.com] think Mond needs to answer her question."

"Mond should make a judgment in court."

"She is entitled to ask Mond to do so."

The members of the jury do not have a legal background. They are old and young, male and female, and they are all made up of randomly selected ordinary people.

Some people say that the jury system of the common law system has led to the long-lasting resistance to the Japanese and violated the principle of litigation efficiency in modern society. And because the jury has no legal background and does not understand the laws and regulations, their judgment and determination of the case is not based on rigorous logical reasoning, but the so-called "sense of social justice" - this is why Lisa wants to make News opinion.

It's hard to say what kind of news brainwashing these jury members have undergone before being selected.

The judge ruled that Xia Xiaolan had won the lawsuit. If the jury disagreed, the lawsuit would be a protracted battle.

The jury system has always been questioned, but it has always been implemented, because these ordinary people who were randomly selected have effectively prevented judges from abusing their judicial power! Temporary formation, random selection, and isolation after the fact are the basic rules of jury. This system can also effectively prevent judicial corruption... It is useless to just bribe the judge. If the judge decides a case that is too absurd, these jury members will be the last A line of defense!

The bias of the trial sounds strange, it must be unfair, and the jury can speak!

Selling miserable to the jury can certainly get sympathy points, and Xia Xiaolan can also win respect by relying on her calm self-confidence.

People who do bad things will feel guilty, panic, and bluff aggressively.

The jury went through morning and afternoon trials, and they made their own judgments.

They asked Mond to answer questions!

Are the so-called professional barriers really that strong?

They want to see if the works selected from the eyes of ordinary people are completely opposite to those selected by the Pritzker Architecture Prize winners - Xia Xiaolan, a Chinese female student, insists on going to the United States to file a lawsuit, there are so many American Witnesses are willing to testify for her in court, and not all of them will be bought off.

&np's partner testified.

Cornell's senior testified.

Cornell professor testified.

Wealthy millionaires testify.

By comparison, Lisa's witness

It's a little weak.

Before Mrs. Wilson even had time to say much, she was overwhelmed by Harold's appearance.

There are also two open portfolios in front of the judge.

"Mr. Mond Dawson, please answer the plaintiff's question and make your own judgment as a professional."

Not only did the judge judge who had the higher level of work, but he also sent the original manuscripts provided by Xia Xiaolan and Lisa to Mond Dawson.

Because the time of the two manuscripts is too close, it is even difficult for the technical appraisal to distinguish which one is the first and which one is the last.

What about professionally?

Can Mond Dawson judge by the idea of ​​​​the design drawing?

There is a difference between the original and the copied, and it can only be judged by a master-level person.

If Mund Dawson makes the right judgment, the court can only go to other master architects. Of course, he could refuse the appraisal, or make a random appraisal, so he would have to pray that Lisa would "create" a steady stream of good works in the future, and Xia Xiaolan would never recover and would never design any more works... or it would be too embarrassing.

How will Mond choose?

Xia Xiaolan smiled at him.

After these days of silence, I want the current general!

She was also afraid that Mond would not be a witness for Lisa.

Fortunately, Mond came.

Will Mond take a risk, correct Lisa's name, and nail Xia Xiaolan, or just stop and brake in time?

Mond finally stretched out his hand and opened the two portfolios placed in front of him. The courtroom was silent, and no one disturbed him - his heart must be in pain, he had read Xia Xiaolan's portfolio before, but he wanted Pretend it's your first time watching!